The Foundation  

Home Up

The Success Foundation

"Without man's dreams there would be none of man's achievements"

 

Index

Company profile

The Success Foundation

Compensation Solutions

News

SuccessNews

Subject Index

Thought for the day

About us

Contacting us

News

"Keeping YOU in the picture"

New All-employee Share Scheme proposals and the Spring Budget July 1999

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The Chancellor has announced that he intends to introduce a new type of tax-advantaged share scheme, which will allow employers to deliver shares to their workforces.

 

So far the details are:

 

All employees must have access to the scheme.
Employees can buy up to £1500pa of the employer's shares out of gross income.
The employer can match the purchased shares with up to 2x free shares.
The employer can allocate up to a further £3000pa of free shares.
Shares must be held for at least 3 years.
Company allocated shares will be tax-free but there will be some tax on purchased shares depending on how long they are held for.
Shares will not have to be allocated or bought on the same basis by all employees.
Performance related allocations are to be encouraged.

 

It seems that these schemes would be very similar to existing Profit-sharing Share Trust Schemes but with employers allowed to give shares to employees. The new schemes are expected to be available from April 2000.

 

Comment:

This could be quite an interesting development, as the ability to accumulate shares over a long period tax-free may become as important a savings vehicle as a pension scheme but with significant benefits for the employer. The downside may be the abolition of existing tax favoured SAYE and Profit-Sharing Share schemes.

 

Quote of the week

 

"Competence comes from skill and practice, but where does commitment come from? Where does trust, reliability, honesty and loyalty come from? Not from your skills, but from your values and beliefs."

 

Dr David Cormack, Professional Manager Nov 92.

 

 

Pensions Issues

 

CLAWBACK hits the headlines.

Companies who try to integrate their pension scheme with the basic state pension by using an offset (a deduction from salary) to calculate pensionable pay, will have found themselves under some pressure recently. With some big names like Barclays Bank already caving in, and the strong possibility of it being indirect sex discrimination, the days of offset may be numbered.

 

What does this mean for your scheme?

It could mean that you have to pay pension contributions on an additional 20% of salary, i.e. it could be expensive.

 

THE COST OF ANNUITIES JUST KEEPS RISING

As we live longer and interest rates fall, so annuities cost more to provide. Many retirees from money purchase plans are finding that their pension is down by up to 1/3rd! This will translate in to increased costs for Defined Benefit plans too, in due course, but so far it has not been as marked as for the Defined Contribution plans, especially PP's and GPP's.

 

Comment:

Investigate income draw-down and other continuing investment options.

 

Directors beware!

 

New rules came in to force in April which make officers of the company liable to pay the company's NI if it has failed to pay due to fraud OR NEGLECT!

 

DID YOU PARTICIPATE IN THE COMPENSATION & BENEFITS PROFESSIONALS SURVEY?

 

Compensation Solutions carried out this unique, e.mail, participant only, survey in January.

 

One of the surprising findings was that a large proportion of the participants had chosen, or were given, car allowances rather than cars. The allowances ranged from £3000 to £9500pa. Perhaps Compensation specialists are more aware than most of the tax impact on company cars?

Though basic salaries clearly reflected management scope, the other surprise was the value placed on experience. A professional aged around 30 with a team of 5, responsible for the compensation function in a UK environment would earn around £52,000pa; with worldwide comp responsibility this might rise to £68,000pa. However, the survey showed a distinct value being placed on experience despite organisational trends towards ageism.

The survey will be run again shortly. If you are interested in participating then e.mail the address below with your name and company and we will send you the details.

 

Compensation Solutions is part of

The Success Foundation.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

The Success Foundation, 23, Ludlow Avenue, Luton, LU1 3RW Telephone & Fax 01582 733581

E.mail SuccessFoundation@compuserve.com

The Spring Budget

COMPANY CARS

The Chancellor changed the tax assessment on cars doing more than 2500 and 18000 business miles, to a flat 25% and 15% of the car's price. This is ahead of the more radical review underway to tax cars according to their rate of pollution.

Meanwhile there is a new tax-exemption for bicycles provided for business use!!!

The rate from April 2002 is 20p per mile.

 

Employer paid car fuel

Car fuel tax was increased as announced last year. The Scale Charges are:

 

Engine size Tax on

<1401cc (Petrol only) £1210

1401-2000cc £1540

>2000cc £2270

 

The Inland Revenue Fixed Mileage Car Rates for tax-free reimbursement of mileage are unchanged.

 

Comment:

In general the changes still make free fuel worth having; see Private Fuel analysis below.

 

FURBS

Not only have these been brought within the NI net from 6th April 1999, but also capital gains tax is now charged at 34% not 23% as previously.

 

The Pension Earnings Cap

This was raised in line with inflation to £90,600 from 6th April 99.

PRP almost dead

The tax-free limit for Profit Related Pay is £1000 from 1st January 1999. This is the last year of such schemes

 

Mobile Phones

Surprisingly, the tax on mobile phones provided by employers has been dropped from April 99.

 

 

 

Along with bicycles there are certain exemptions to tax for company provided, or supported, transport.

 

For example, Holiday Centres that provide mini-buses to collect employees from outlying districts may now be able to use this benefit, though the bus must have more than 17 seats.

Individual Learning Accounts

The precise purpose of these is not clear, but companies can contribute and there is no taxable benefit if lower paid employees also receive a subsidy.

 

Computers provided for home use

Loan of company provided equipment up to £2000 in value will not be an assessable benefit, but all employees must have the opportunity to borrow it, not just Directors or Senior Staff.

 

BE WARNED

Personal Service Companies

Watch out next year

 

It is not uncommon practice for certain skills, often in IT but elsewhere too, to be obtained through contracts of service with one-person companies. In effect the person is hired but they remain independent.

 

The Government is going to make employers responsible for tax and NI from 2000 as if they were employees.

 

Watch this space for more news.

 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The chart above shows the fixed value of fuel as determined by the Fuel Scale Charge and marginal tax rate (the horizontal lines) and the actual cost of fuel depending on mileage (at 70p per litre) and fuel consumption. So for example, the solid horizontal lines represent a Fuel Scale Charge of £2270 at tax rates of 40% and 23%. So, for a 40% taxpayer, free fuel is valuable if personal mileage exceeds 7000 miles pa but for a standard rate taxpayer it is valuable for more than 4000 miles.

Anyone doing more than 8500 private miles pa at any tax rate and with any car doing 30mpg or better, is always better off taking company paid fuel.

News

"Keeping YOU in the picture"

Legislation Special & the Spring Budget July 1998

DO NOT DISMISS THE IMPACT OF THIS LEGISLATION. IT AFFECTS EVERYONE.

Yes, unfortunately whether or not you have employees paid less than the minimum or working longer than 48 hours, YOU ARE AFFECTED.

 

While most of us were concentrating on the actual limits themselves, few of us realised that the regulations include two very important words

 

* RECORD KEEPING *

 

Do you currently keep records?

There are many employees for whom there are no working time records, but from 1st October this will be illegal. Both the WTD and NMW require records to be kept so that employers can defend themselves against accusations of law breaking. And remember, in a reversal of the usual judicial system, an individual can bring a claim with no evidence, and you will be deemed guilty unless you can provide proof that you are not.

 

NMW

The Government have followed the Low Pay Commission recommendation and announced a minimum wage from April 1999 of £3.60ph with a reduction to £3.00 for those under 22 (under 18’s are excluded). It seems that there are no regional or industry differences, though tips and accommodation may be the subject of special treatment.

 

An itemised pay slip may be required to show the hours worked as well as the earnings.

 

The WTD

This requires that employees do not work more than 48 hours per week averaged over a 17 week period (in some cases longer), and there are statutory breaks and rest periods. The main impact is night working, but shift workers are also affected.

 

There is a minimum of 4 weeks annual holiday for all employees with more than 3 month’s service (3 weeks in 1998 only) though this includes statutory holidays. It cannot be paid in- lieu or rolled-over.

 

Records are required for all employees to be kept for 2 years, showing the hours actually worked over the period.

 

Does this mean compulsory clocking-in?

The NMW Bill and WTD Consultative Paper leave the method of recording open, but what is clear is that records will have to be kept. This is not the contractual hours worked, it is the actual hours worked. Thus it seems that clocking-on and off, or timesheets, will be required. Self-declaration may be a possibility but the spin off is the possible realisation of just how many hours people are working. One client has already estimated that their employees work 10-15% more unpaid hours than contractually required. It is also worth remembering that this could bring your actual minimum rates within the NMW!

 

Comment: Record keeping is going to be a big issue, involving not one but two separate pieces of legislation.

 

The WTD is expected to apply from the 1st October, so there is a need to start considering the issues now.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Part-time Work Directive

 

A new Directive has now been issued that requires, within 2 years, for part-timers to be given rights to benefits pro-rata to their full-time colleagues. This means rights to bonuses, pensions, shift-pay, holidays, sick leave, staff discounts, share options, etc. There appears to be no lower hours limit, but temporary, casual and seasonal workers are excluded.

 

Comment: This has been coming for some time and most employers seem to be applying pro-rata benefits already.

 

Stakeholder Pensions

The Government's delayed consultation document is a confusing one. Its thinking is contradictory and its direction unclear. On the one hand is the desire to have something simple and affordable whilst on the other are issues of choice, flexibility, contracting-in/out and transferability.

 

However one key theme appears to be compulsion. There is a growing feeling that employees may be required to join their employer’s schemes. Not only will this be unattractive to the low paid, but many employers will not relish the thought of, in some cases, perhaps a further 50% increase in their membership, and perhaps a 20% increase in funding. Added to this it appears that the Basic State Pension could easily become means tested.

 

Fortunately the government seem rather appalled at the can-of-worms they have opened, so progress may be slower than originally anticipated.

 

Comment: Since the whole pensions scene is now under review by the Government, it seems that the best recommendation is to do nothing until further details are published. Watch this space!

The Spring Budget

This was yet another surprising Budget with few of the many rumoured tax increases materialising. Is this really New Labour or just bluff?

 

Employer paid car fuel

Car fuel tax was increased as previously announced. Gordon Brown has already stated that he intends to eliminate any tax advantages of company paid fuel, and a further review of car tax is underway.

 

Comment: In general the changes still make free fuel worth having this year but see Company Car Fuel Analysis table below.

 

FURBS

Not only have these been brought within the NI net from 6th April 1999, but capital gains tax is now charged at 34% not 23% as previously.

 

 

 

The Pension Earnings Cap

This was raised in line with inflation to £87,600 from 6th April 98.

Foreign Employment

One of the biggest surprises was the abolition of the Foreign Earnings deduction. Working abroad will no longer exclude an employee from UK tax.

Comment. This has a major impact on UK expatriates who now lose their tax breaks when remaining resident in the UK. Though more comprehensive double taxation treaties will help, it is necessary to review in detail the new tax position for each affected person.

 

PRP Deadline approaches

The tax free limit for PRP is now £2000 and will be reduced still further to £1000 from 1st January 1999.

 

Comment: Organisations with salary sacrifice arrangements should have reviewed their schemes already. (see last SuccessNews)

 

 

New Success number.

We now have a new e.mail address for those wanting to write to us this way. You can contact us at

 

SuccessFoundation@compuserve.com

 

A Web site is under investigation.

Please also remember,

The Success Foundation telephone & fax number is now 01582 733581

 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

The Success Foundation, 23, Ludlow Avenue, Luton, LU1 3RW Telephone & Fax 01582 733581

Company cars after the budget

By

Peter Hunt, Founder of Compensation Solutions

Two important items were announced in the budget regarding company cars.

  1. Fuel scale benefit
  2. The Chancellor of the Exchequer increased the fuel scale charge by 40%.

    The petrol car rates for 2000/2001 are (1999/2000 in brackets)

    Up to 1400cc £1,700 (£1,210)

    1401-2000cc £2,170 (£1,540)

    over 2000cc £3,200 (£2,270)

    In most cases it is still worth having free fuel provided by your employer as long as you drive over 9000 private miles annually, but the table below shows this by tax band and car engine size.

  3. Car tax rates from 2002 onwards

The new CO2 emissions based method of taxing cars has some interesting effects.

The table below shows how it will work, and clearly the delayed implementation is to enable employees to make their car choices now on the basis of the new tax regime. It is worth remembering that in view of the reduced CO2 scale in years 2003 and 2004, any car user who has the same company car during the 3 years from 2002 will see their taxable percentage automatically rise by 2% each year!

Perk car taxation going down!

One of the most interesting features of the new regime is that because the mileage factor is removed, those with perk cars will tend to be far better off than those who need their car for business. So, while an executive with a perk Vauxhall Vectra 2.0 will see their tax rate fall from 35% to 22%, the high mileage sales person with the same car will probably see their tax rise from 15% to 22%. It is a funny old world we live in!

We might also be permitted to ask why the Chancellor capped the tax at 35%?

If he really wanted to clean up the environment what was gained by stopping at 35%? The big gas guzzlers like Jaguars and Range Rovers, are so far above the top of the scale that their owners will continue to pay 35%, so there is absolutely no incentive for them to take smaller cars!

Diesel cars still beneficial

Just before you thought diesels weren't worth having due to the 3% surcharge, many diesel cars are rated between 20 and 40 g/km less than their petrol counterpart so the reduction in percentage due to low emissions is still significantly greater than the 3% surcharge.

 

Compensation Solutions, 01582 733581, e.mail successfoundation@compuserve.com

Compensation Solutions is part of The Success Foundation

News

"Keeping YOU in the picture"

 

The National Minimum Wage & Working Time Regulations - Update December 98

Our last newsletter summarised the impending legislation. Here we catch up on the latest news.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The WTD is now in force and because it has been brought in under European Health & Safety legislation, the Chief Executive of your organisation is, ultimately, responsible for compliance.

 

They can be personally fined and/or imprisoned for failure to do so.

 

 

Two examples of how you might be caught out are given here.

Ø

 

Example 1

You have an employee working in your IT Department. Contractual hours are 35 and there is normally no paid overtime. Due to pressure of work with the Millennium bug, this person has been paid overtime for hours in excess of 5 per week and they have been working 12 or more each week. Though the overtime is voluntary there is a lot of pressure to do it. There has been a problem with this employee's work in the past and it comes to a head. A parting of the ways is agreed but then you receive an IT1 claiming breach of the WTD. Clearly you have records of your overtime working, but there is the matter of the unpaid 5 hours. In addition this employee claims they worked through their lunch breaks and it was well known that no-one took more than 1/2 an hour for lunch and most ate a sandwich and worked at the same time.

 

What records will you have to document your innocence?

 

 

 

Example 2

An employee is a manager who has signed an opt-out agreement. They regularly start at 8 and finish at 7, though again contracted to only 35 hours. They fall out with their colleagues and leave but bring an IT1 on the grounds that the rest breaks were not honoured and they weren't allowed to take their full 4 weeks holiday in the year. (You had agreed with them to roll it over, even though the WTD doesn't allow this).

 

Remember, the opt-out has a specific requirement to keep working time records, and the opt-out does not relate to annual leave entitlement.

 

YOU ARE GUILTY

The onus of proof is on the employer not the employee. An employee can thus bring a claim for failure to honour the rest breaks, give sufficient holiday, or require voluntary working in excess of contractual hours, and in excess of 48. If the employer can provide no evidence to the contrary, they have breached the regulations; IT'S AS SIMPLE AS THAT.

* RECORD KEEPING *

 

Record keeping is vital AND, if the Working Time Regulations weren't enough, the NMW consultative paper suggests that there will be much more precise definitions of working time in the NMW regulations.

 

For example there are definitions of "downtime", "stand-by" and "on-call" time, "Travel" time, "training" time, "absence" and "sickness". Indeed even "rest breaks" are defined.

 

 

 

 

Sales staff "travelling time" will count for NMW purposes? There is even a suggestion that annual hours contracts may fail to meet the NMW criteria!

 

SPECIAL RULES

 

For those earning less than £12000pa, there are specific records that will need to be kept under the NMW regulations. These include:

All money payments paid to the worker as gross pay
The amount of any tips paid through payroll
The amount of tips not paid through payroll
Reimbursement of business expenses
Deductions for living expenses in excess of 50p/hour
Overtime and shift pay
Special payments
PRP
The total hours worked
Any absence

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is so that the actual wage for compliance purposes can be calculated and compared with the NMW.

 

So you see, record keeping is not a piece of cake.

 

 

 

Current activity

It appears that few companies have changed their hours recording yet, but the introduction of some form of time sheet seems to be the most popular proposal. Some are moving to full-scale time recording systems and many, it seems, will do nothing.

 

 

If moving to time sheets, these are some decisions that will need to be made.

How will coffee and tea breaks be recorded?
When does working time start? When an employee arrives on the premises or when they start contractual hours?
Similar decision for late working.
What happens about working lunches?
What about travelling overnight?
What will be working time for external training courses?

 

 

If you have not established your method of monitoring working time, or you need help, call

Peter Hunt at The Success Foundation now.

 

 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Stakeholder Pensions

It is rumoured that the government has got cold feet on this subject and that its White Paper will not be issued until next year. Apparently cost to the exchequer is beginning to be an issue.

 

 

 

 

The Success Foundation, 23, Ludlow Avenue, Luton, LU1 3RW Telephone & Fax 01582 733581

E.mail SuccessFoundation@compuserve.com

News

"Keeping YOU in the picture"

Pensions in melt-down October 2002

 

Virtually every day now there are reports of how too few employees are saving for their old age and how most are going to have to rely on State Benefits that the government is keen to reduce. This has ended up with debates about Defined Benefit versus Defined Contribution, the affordability of corporate pensions, and the need for pension provision at all. With the recent turbulent stock market performance, many have asked, "What is the point of a pension?" This Newsletter goes back to some basics.

 

The basic facts.

 

In the good old days, and the ones we seem to wish to emulate now, employees had no pension promises from employers. They were totally dependent upon (usually inadequate) State provision. If one was wealthy one saved for a rainy day. If not, then retirement wasn't an option. This left employers with a problem.

 

Jo, the loyal servant of 55 years (started work at 15), would ask what he would get when he was finally forced to retire by his caring employer because he could no longer work. The answer was often nothing, other than a gold watch. But this put employers on the spot when Jo happened to be a senior executive. To give Jo a golden handshake was the answer but this could be costly and was totally unbudgeted. So enlightened employers started to fund these arrangements. In time the Inland Revenue would come to make tax concessions regarding this form of saving by employers.

 

It was only in 1946 that a state retirement age was introduced and the guarantee of an income with it, the National Insurance pension. Interestingly the average wife's age was 60 when a man was 65, and that was why differential retirement ages were established. The other interesting fact was that a man of 65 could expect to live only 4 more years in 1946. How things have changed on both fronts.

 

Where are we now?

 

Mr Average (and to a lesser extent Mrs Average) now see retirement at 55 as the optimum, 60 at the latest. However a 60 year old man can now expect to live a further 21 years and a 60 year old woman a further 24 years. This could mean that after a University education, starting work at say 22, a modern youngster's expectation is to work for 33 years and retire for 26/29 years (probably nearer 30/34 by the time they do actually retire). It doesn't take a mathematician to work out that this is not sustainable unless that youngster is able to save around half their income for each working year!

So why all the reports and disillusionment?

 

Pension schemes cannot afford to provide pensions for upwards of 30 years, youngsters cannot afford to save half their income and don't want to accept working till 70 or 75. Our solution is to revert to the good old days and not provide a pension at all, or to provide one that is so inadequate that it will create even more disillusionment.

 

Alan Pickering reported that he thought the pension age might have to rise to 70 and this recommendation was initially treated with scorn. Unfortunately, the truth is that even this is probably too low. We must return to a balance between the time spent working and the time spent retired. That ratio was under 0.1 years per working year in 1946. To return to that ratio the retirement age should be 75 now!

 

So what does this mean for business?

 

The key issues being faced, but of which employers may be currently unaware, are:

 

  1. Pension costs will rise substantially just to maintain a retirement age of 65, perhaps double the current funding rates or worse.
  2.  

  3. Early retirement before the age of 65 is almost certainly unsustainable.
  4.  

  5. The DC/DB debate is probably a distraction and is not relevant to the cost explosion.
  6.  

  7. Employees remain blissfully ignorant of the real costs of retirement despite over 3 decades of "communication".

 

Businesses are being squeezed between unreasonable employee expectations and a huge hike in costs.

 

Unfortunately programmes like Channel 4's "The Truth about Pensions" can mislead everyone. By confusing an annuity with a pension it failed to remind us of just how expensive retirement is. Perhaps employers now need to embark on that communication issue long forgotten, and explain why we have a pension scheme (or not) and why it must be so expensive and involve working so long. When we return to reality we can start getting our house in order in terms of the level of benefit we can afford to provide and the best method, for the company and employee, of providing it.

 

If you have problems dealing with the realities of pension provision in your organisation, and would like an unbiased review of the way forward, give us a call.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

The Success Foundation, 23, Ludlow Avenue, Luton, LU1 3RW Telephone & Fax 01582 733581

E.mail SuccessFoundation@compuserve.com

 

News

"Keeping YOU in the picture"

Latest NewsOctober 2003

A hard copy of this SuccessNews can be sent if you prefer. Please send your address (see Contacting us)

It has been a long time since our last SuccessNews. So this edition is to bring you up-to-date.

The first piece of news is that we have a website. To get more up-to-the-minute news just access www.successfoundation.org.uk where issues may be covered in more depth.

The National Minimum Wage

If you weren't already aware this rose by 30p per hour from 1st October, to £4.50 for adults and 20p per hour for youngsters & trainees.

A further increase to £4.85 and £4.10 from 1st October next year has already been agreed by the Government. This will mean a 15% increase over 2 years!

Use of Mobile Phones (Cellphones) whilst driving to be banned.

From 1st December 2003 it will be illegal to use a mobile phone in a car while it is moving. This appears not to apply to hands-free use, though we will need to see the final regulations to be sure of exactly what is covered. There is some confusion about what is, and isn't, to be allowed, but it appears that to comply with the law and avoid a £30 on-the-spot fine or £1000 if it goes to court, the best advice is for the vehicle to be stationary and more than just temporarily, before a hand held phone is used.

The last Budget

Some minor changes were made to various Inland Revenue concessions.

Long-service Awards

The maximum tax and NI free  (TANIF) awards can now be based on £50 per year of service, rather than the previous £20.

Annual parties

The amount per head per annum allowed for staff parties has been increased from £75 to £150.

Cycle to work days

Employers can provide free meals to cyclists. The previous limit on the number of days per year when this was permitted has been removed.

Home Working Allowance

An employee who works at home can now be provided with up to £2 pw TANIF(Tax & NI free)  without anyone needing to keep records of expenses incurred. More TANIF payments can be made but the company must keep suitable records of the additional expenses the employee has incurred.

Car benefits

The trend for companies to provide car allowances and/or special car purchase/leasing arrangements, has continued apace. However, for those still providing company cars it is worth noting the current and planned CO2 thresholds and the percentage of price to be paid each year.

2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 % of price Typical car in 2003
155 145 140 15* Ford Fiesta 1.4
160 150 145 16* Ford Focus 1.4
165 155 150 17* Megane 1.6
170 160 155 18* Ford Focus 1.6
175 165 160 19* Astra 1.4
180 170 165 20* Astra 1.6
185 175 170 21* Ford Focus 1.8
190 180 175 22* Audi A3 1.8
195 185 180 23* Ford Mondeo 2.0
200 190 185 24*  
205 195 190 25*  
210 200 195 26* Ford Focus 2.0
215 205 200 27*  
220 210 205 28* BMW 320i
225 215 210 29* Rover 75 2.5
230 220 215 30* BMW 525i
235 225 220 31* Jaguar X 2.5
240 230 225 32*  
245 235 230 33** Mondeo 2.5
250 240 235 34***  
255 245 240 35**** BMW 735i

*Add 3% if car runs solely on diesel.

**Add 2% if car runs solely on diesel.

***Add 1% if car runs solely on diesel.

****Maximum charge, no diesel supplement.

What have we been doing?

Recent activity has centred on Incentive Plan design, Job Evaluation, salary structure design, and Corporate visioning.

Incentive Plans

Attempts to improve employee performance continue to be a corporate priority. Unfortunately many of the incentive schemes we see are little more than a discretionary bonus. Some rules are given below.

It is absolutely crucial to identify real, meaningfull and measurable business aims and this is often more difficult than it appears.

The 10 rules of successful incentive bonus schemes.

1. Keep all documentation to 1 page.

2. Make the headline eye-catching.

3. Be positive. Show how bonus can be earned, not why it can't!

4. Keep all restrictions & conditions to the small print.

5. Focus on 1 key objective.

6. Make other objectives subsidiary or conditional.

7. Keep it simple.

8. Spend time finding appropriate measures.

9. Model the likely cost outcomes.

10. Communicate, communicate, communicate!

Job Evaluation

Is the broad banding fad over?

It seems that there is a revival of interest in more conventional job evaluated pay structures. It is proving difficult to pin down why, but perhaps there is an awareness that the downside of flexibility is lack of control. Many industries are finding it necessary to to keep a lid on wage drift and more formal tools are needed to handle it.

Corporate visioning

One of the crucial tasks in any organisation is giving direction. Unfortunately there is sometimes an assumption that everyone knows where it is going, when this is usually not the case. Setting out your fundamental aims and values, and communicating them to your staff is still a critical leadership issue.

Richard Leider in his book "Business-The ultimate resource" refers to 4 core questions that every employee wants clarified.

1. Where are we going?

2. What are we doing to get there?

3. What do you want me to do?

4. What's in it for me when I do?

Pensions

The new government contribution limits applicable from April 2005 will change the pensions scene forever. With a lifetime limit and annual maximums the way pensions are accrued will be much more flexible. No longer a need to limit contribution to 1/60th for 40 years, employers now have the option to weight contributions to longer serving or older employees in much more motivational ways than previously.

As a reward tool pensions will be a very strong lever to get real mileage out of a usually very heavy cost.

With the diminished trust of employees in pension arrangements, you might like to reassure them by introducing an Independent Trustee. These are difficult to find but we already act as advisors to the Trustees of some schemes.

 
Send mail to peterhunt@successfoundation.org.uk with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: November 04, 2004